The Northern California District Court has dismissed the claims made by two investors against Ripple regarding XRP as false.The Northern California District Court findings released online in the last 24 hours by Law360 state that claims regarding Ripple and the XRP token made by two investors cannot be proven.The case was concerning the on-going legal dispute which began in May 2018 between Ripple Labs including CEO Brad Garlinghouse and disgruntled investors as to whether the native token XRP is, or is not a security by legal definition. They claim that Ripple should have made a formal application to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) for their cryptocurrency XRP to become a security.The company has been consistently adamant of the latter because of any direct connection
Topics:
<title> considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Bitcoin Schweiz News writes Das ist das Crypto Builders Gathering in St. Moritz: Der Treffpunkt für die Zukunft der Krypto-Technologien
Wayne Jones writes Bad News for Crypto? Elizabeth Warren to Succeed Sherrod Brown on House Banking Committee
Martin Young writes Ethereum’s Modular Strategy: Short-Term Pain, Long-Term Gain, Says Research
Dimitar Dzhondzhorov writes 4 Reasons Why Bitcoin’s (BTC) Price Might See a Short-Term Correction
The Northern California District Court has dismissed the claims made by two investors against Ripple regarding XRP as false.
The Northern California District Court findings released online in the last 24 hours by Law360 state that claims regarding Ripple and the XRP token made by two investors cannot be proven.
The case was concerning the on-going legal dispute which began in May 2018 between Ripple Labs including CEO Brad Garlinghouse and disgruntled investors as to whether the native token XRP is, or is not a security by legal definition. They claim that Ripple should have made a formal application to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) for their cryptocurrency XRP to become a security.
The company has been consistently adamant of the latter because of any direct connection between the company Ripple and their token XRP, maintaining innocent on any legal wrong-doing during the course of this claim.
Court Findings
In the case, the court found that the lead plaintiff failed to provide the necessary evidence in the courtroom to support multiple claims regarding XRP’s non-security status, Brad Garlinghouse’s personal holdings and monetary intentions, XRP’s sale strategy, as well as the company’s software products.
The court file concluded that all of these accusations were “purported misstatements” and that “in short, Plaintiff fails to offer the factual allegations needed to show that Ripple and Mr. Garlinghouse’s statements were false when made”.
Ripple’s Legal Team added that all outstanding fraud claims were “unsupported leaps of logic.” In June 2019, they applied for a court dismissal against the mentioned plaintiffs. The latter responded with opposition to the motion claiming to hold over “a dozen false or misleading statements made by Ripple and its CEO.”
The court hearing has today dismissed all of these statements as false. The impact that will have for the future of Ripple as a company and a legal entity, as well as XRP, is perhaps more propitious than before.
Having obtained a diploma in Intercultural Communication, Julia continued her studies taking a Master’s degree in Economics and Management. Becoming captured by innovative technologies, Julia turned passionate about exploring emerging techs believing in their ability to transform all spheres of our life.