Thursday , April 16 2026
Home / Crypto news / Judge in SBF Case Recuses Herself Citing Possible Conflict of Interset

Judge in SBF Case Recuses Herself Citing Possible Conflict of Interset

Summary:
Federal judge Ronnie Abrams, who used to oversee the case against Sam Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison, and Gary Wang, has formally recused herself. According to an order from December 23rd, Federal judge at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has recused herself from the action. The order states: It has come to the Court’s attention that the law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, at which my husband is a partner, advised FTX in 2021, as well as represented parties that may be adverse to FTX and Defendant Bankman-Fried in other proceedigs (or potential proceedings). My husband has no involvement in any of these representations. […] Nonetheless, to avoid any possible conflict, or the appearance of one, the Court hereby recuses itself from

Topics:
George Georgiev considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Chayanika Deka writes Yuga Labs Secures Major Win as SEC Closes Investigation Without Charges

Andrew Throuvalas writes Bitcoin Soars Back To ,000 After BlackRock CEO Says “Buy The Dip”

Chayanika Deka writes XRP, SOL, and ADA Inclusion in US Crypto Reserve Pushes Traders on Edge

Chayanika Deka writes Why Arthur Hayes Is Bullish on Bitcoin Under Trump’s Economic Strategy

Federal judge Ronnie Abrams, who used to oversee the case against Sam Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison, and Gary Wang, has formally recused herself.

  • According to an order from December 23rd, Federal judge at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has recused herself from the action.
  • The order states:

It has come to the Court’s attention that the law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, at which my husband is a partner, advised FTX in 2021, as well as represented parties that may be adverse to FTX and Defendant Bankman-Fried in other proceedigs (or potential proceedings). My husband has no involvement in any of these representations. […] Nonetheless, to avoid any possible conflict, or the appearance of one, the Court hereby recuses itself from this action.

  • Meanwhile, Sam Bankman-Fried was previously allowed to stay in his parents’ home and released on a $250 million bail.
  • It’s important to note that he didn’t have to pay the full amount, which is used as a deterrent in case he fails to honor the conditions of his bail agreement.
  • The judge who allowed the bail was Gabriel Gorenstein.

You Might Also Like:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *